INDIVIDUALISED FUNDING (IF)
Karen Smith from the MoH in Auckland was driving the Individualised
Funding model’s introduction. This is coming, at present it
is being trialled via Manawanui In Charge (MIC). However it will
be introduced through various service providers and implementation
is expected to begin occurring by May 2010. Stay posted. If you
wish to know more, go to
www.incharge.org.nz
. This could affect a number of our members, in a positive way hopefully.
I.F. is a system where you can contract your own carers to provide
supports, as opposed to going through a service provider. The systems
will be flexible and for some aspects you can still use the services
of a provider to help you. If required you can still use all the
services of a provider.
IRIS Ltd, our service arm, is hoping to be a conduit through which
IF can be accessed.
ENTITLEMENT???
An interesting discussion occurred regarding why NASCs sometimes
do not inform consumers of what they are entitled to.... and the
answer was that it was not an entitlement scheme!. It was mentioned
that it was a needs based system based within budgetary constraints.
Still we thought a person should be made aware of everything, even
if they could not have it.
LOCAL AREA CO-ORDINATION (LAC)
John Wilkinson from the MoH discussed his investigations of the
Queensland and Western Australian Local Area Co-ordination systems.
So what do these co-ordinators do:
Provide links into the community, they assume the family knows best
and take it from there, their first question is ‘What is a
good life for you?’
They establish a good working relationship with the family and develop
trust. They assist with clarifying strengths and weakness. They
assist in developing natural networks and connections. They help
access Government and Council supports and benefits. They provide
a Disability Information and Advisory Service and help people to
advocate for themselves.
The LAC system is voluntary. Of those eligible, only 40% use it,
the rest have it done via service providers.... this was a bit surprising
for me. There is about 1 co-ordinator per 10,000 people and each
would be assisting approximately 40 families. The usual trend is
that families need intensive input in the beginning which tapers
off as the family finds its feet and comes up to speed. There were
problems with introducing the system as many parts were already
being done in NZ. Some of the Iwi models of support were very similar
and these were being investigated as well. The introduction of the
LAC system could have some way to go.
ESS (MoH Equipment Funders)
Sue Primrose (MoH) informed the meeting that a new prioritisation
methodology was being investigated to handle requests for equipment.
At present the lower limit for something to be applied for is $37...
seems ridiculously low for the bureaucracy involved. They are looking
at putting this up to maybe $200, possibly a little too high, anyway...
. Since last Nov they have seen a surge in requests for equipment
and as at the end of Nov there was about $18M in application pending.
Accessable and Enable are the bodies that assess everyone for equipment,
the ESS provides the funding and guidelines. Accessable does from
the Bombay’s north, Enable to the South. The total funding
available per year is around $60m, it is split up into monthly allotments,
at present they use a waiting list system but the new prioritisation
system will eventually replace this (probably around Feb 2010).
The pool of funds is not just for the disabled but also covers those
over 65. Boy, they will need the wisdom of Solomon to get a good
prioritisation system. However they have assured us that the system
will be fair, transparent, open and designed to achieve value for
money, so it will be interesting to see it in its final incarnation.
In conclusion, there are a number of changes coming up. Who knows
where they will lead?, certainly this National Health Board has
the potential to make things quite different from the way the health
world is at present.